Yes, and some clarity in wording helps to make this person's intent clearer than before.
I would presume all messages would be sent knowing they can, would, and likely are being intercepted more than once along the way. So that is worth keeping in mind. None of these are meant to be secure.
Even if such a deal is made, what is behind it? In thought. I don't need to think someone is beyond foolishness or hubris to believe they're also not this shortsighted given the nature of the siege that's been ongoing.
no subject
I would presume all messages would be sent knowing they can, would, and likely are being intercepted more than once along the way. So that is worth keeping in mind. None of these are meant to be secure.
Even if such a deal is made, what is behind it? In thought. I don't need to think someone is beyond foolishness or hubris to believe they're also not this shortsighted given the nature of the siege that's been ongoing.